The things journalists should check before publishing an article are not limited to the body text.
They need to check sources, materials, photos, recordings, publication time, contact paths, supplementary posts, and revision history.
Even if names are withheld in the article body, sources or people involved may be inferred from how detailed the quotes are, material metadata, photo backgrounds, and replies after publication.
A pre-publication check is not meant to weaken the article.
It is work that protects people while still delivering necessary facts.
What to check in the body text
In the body text, check information that could identify sources or people involved.
Look not only at names, but also departments, job titles, dates and times, places, speaking habits, and information known by only a limited number of people.
Body text check item
What to look at
Proper nouns
Company names, school names, department names, region names
Timeline
Whether it connects to a source's actions or work records
Quotations
Whether a person can be identified from speech patterns or internal terms
Number of people
Whether candidates are narrowed to a small group
Background explanation
Whether the reporting path is revealed more than necessary
Specificity is necessary in an article.
However, specificity can put a source at risk. Separate information readers need from information that only narrows the source.
Check headlines and summaries too
In a pre-publication check, review not only the body text but also headlines, leads, social media post text, notification text, and the descriptions that appear in search results.
Even if the body text is carefully generalized, a headline or summary that says too much can make sources or people involved identifiable.
Item to check
What to look at
Headline
Whether it overexposes organization names, regions, or positions
Lead
Whether it contains information more specific than the body text
Social media post text
Whether it exposes source information to get attention
Search description
Whether information visible outside the page is too specific
Notification text
Whether identifying details appear in a short message
The places readers see first are more likely to spread and be saved.
Treat headlines and announcement text as part of the same anonymity check as the article body.
What to check in materials
Materials retain information outside the body text.
PDFs, Office files, images, audio, video, and screenshots may contain authors, revision history, comments, filenames, GPS, capture date and time, and background sounds.
Material
What to check
PDF
Author, annotations, embedded text, redaction
Office
Revision history, comments, author, hidden sheets
Photos
, GPS, background, reflections, name tags
Audio
Background sounds, voices, recording date and time, filename
Screenshots
Notifications, account names, time, UI
As a rule, do not publish originals as-is.
Create a publication copy and check both metadata and content. However, when evidentiary value matters, confirm with the newsroom or a specialist whether the material can be modified.
Check publication time
Publication time can also be a clue.
If an article is published right after a specific meeting, during work hours, immediately after an internal document was viewed, or right after travel from a scene, it may connect to the actions of a source or person involved.
Publication time clue
Risk
Right after a meeting
Attendees or material viewers are suspected
During work hours
It connects to organizational logs
Right after a site visit
Reporting location or participants are inferred
Repeated late-night publication
The editorial setup or reporter's life rhythm becomes visible
Repeated on a specific weekday
The reporting and editing cycle becomes visible
If there is no need to publish urgently, shifting the time may be an option.
However, balance this with news value and safety.
Anticipate reader inference
Before publication, imagine how readers may infer information.
The article will be read not only by readers acting in good faith, but also by people inside the organization, people involved, critical readers, and people trying to find the source. Each notices different information.
Reader
Information they focus on
People inside the organization
Departments, material scope, meeting dates and times, wording
Local people
Places, facilities, schools, routine places
People involved
Speech habits, positions, information they know
Critical readers
Contradictions, timelines, supplementary posts
People looking for the source
Every clue that narrows the candidate pool
An article is not necessarily read only by the readers you intended.
Before publication, check what different readers can see.
Plan for post-publication additions
A pre-publication check also considers what will be said after publication.
When you add context on social media, answer reader questions, respond to objections, or handle rebuttals after an article is published, information withheld from the body text may come out.
What may happen after publication
What to decide in advance
Readers ask questions
The scope of answers and the person responsible
The subject of reporting pushes back
How detailed the additional explanation should be
A correction becomes necessary
How to present the difference and explanation
You contact the source
Path, time, and necessity
More materials are requested
The scope that can be published
The more rushed the response after publication, the more unnecessary information tends to be added.
Decide the response policy before publication.
Finally, read from the source's position
Right before publication, reread the article from the source's position.
Consider: "Will this wording reveal me?" "If colleagues or supervisors read it, will they narrow the candidates?" "Does the material's origin become visible?" "Will someone be suspected after publication?"
Question
What to look at
How many candidates remain?
Whether the source is narrowed to a small group
Can it be found outside the body text?
Look at photos, materials, timing, and social media additions
Does it draw in people involved?
Impact on family, colleagues, and people at the scene
Will someone be suspected after publication?
Whether it connects to organizational reactions or logs
Is consultation needed?
Legal, safety, or specialist review
Source protection does not conflict with the reliability of an article.
It is the work of keeping necessary facts and removing unnecessary identifying information.
Options when the article is not ready to publish
The check may show that the article cannot be published as-is.
In that case, abandoning the article is not the only option. You can delay publication, change how materials are presented, make quotations less specific, turn details into a summary, avoid using images, add third-party review, or seek legal advice.
Problem
Option
The source is narrowed down
Blur timing or job title/role, delay publication
Material metadata is uncertain
Recreate the publication copy
The image creates risk
Do not use the image, or replace it with a diagram
Legal judgment is needed
Consult the newsroom or a lawyer
Post-publication response is undecided
Decide the reply policy before publishing
A pre-publication check is not only for stopping publication.
It is for finding ways to publish while lowering risk.
Summary
A journalist's pre-publication check covers body text, materials, images, audio, publication time, and post-publication response.
Even if names are withheld, sources and people involved may be inferred from departments, dates and times, quotations, material metadata, photo backgrounds, and post-publication additions.
Separate originals from publication copies, and check body text and materials together.
Finally, reread from the source's position and consider how far the candidate pool is narrowed.
A pre-publication check is not a process for weakening facts, but a process for protecting people while delivering necessary information.
Related tools
Reverse image search
Google Lens
An external resource related to this article. Open it only when it fits your situation and threat model.
Why it is listed: It can help with the article topic, but it is outside Anonymity Sense and should be checked before use.